WhatsApp has over 2.7 billion monthly active users but only generates around $1 per user per year. Meanwhile, platforms like YouTube, TikTok and Instagram earn significantly more revenue per user. So why has WhatsApp struggled so much to monetize its immense popularity?
A Lifelong Battle to Turn Users into Revenue
Since launching in 2009, WhatsApp has relied heavily on investor funding to stay afloat. Early investments from founders’ friends and Sequoia Capital kept WhatsApp running for the first few years. But despite reaching 400 million active users by 2014, WhatsApp was still losing over $200 million per year.
Clearly, the messaging platform’s lose-making growth trajectory was unsustainable without the backing of a wealthy tech giant. Hence, Facebook acquired WhatsApp in 2014 to provide the financial support needed to continue gaining users.
Facebook Undermines WhatsApp’s Revenue Streams
Surprisingly, WhatsApp’s revenue generation became even less of a priority after the Facebook acquisition. In 2016, Facebook made WhatsApp free to use, dropping the previous $1 annual subscription fee.
The move likely boosted user growth but eliminated WhatsApp’s only real revenue stream at the time. And contrary to early indications, Facebook refrained from monetizing all the additional user data they now had access to.
Sharing WhatsApp user data with Facebook to target ads triggered a backlash in 2017. WhatsApp’s founders soon left over disagreements around data privacy. And after the 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal damaged Facebook’s reputation, large-scale data collection was clearly no longer an option.
With few ethical monetization avenues available, WhatsApp’s lack of profits persists to this day.
WhatsApp Business Offers Hope
In early 2018, WhatsApp launched WhatsApp Business to facilitate communication between companies and customers. It shows some promise as an indirect route to monetization that retains user goodwill.
Under the model, businesses pay for WhatsApp usage above 1,000 conversations per month. So WhatsApp Business revenue comes mostly from larger companies needing to connect with consumers via messaging.
Zuckerberg suggests this enterprise-focused offering represents the future of WhatsApp revenue generation. And that may well prove to be the case.
But it fails to tap into direct monetization of WhatsApp’s core user base for personal messaging. And turning peer-to-peer communication into a lucrative revenue stream appears increasingly unlikely.
Battling Apple’s iMessage for Market Share
When WhatsApp first launched, its main competition was telcos providing paid SMS and call plans. By offering a free messaging alternative, WhatsApp quickly achieved global scale.
But now, outside a handful of iPhone-dominated countries, WhatsApp penetration has essentially peaked. Virtually everywhere besides the US, Canada and parts of Europe is at 97%+ market saturation.
Within those iPhone strongholds, the last major untapped market, WhatsApp now finds itself up against iMessage. And Apple has no incentive to monetize iMessage when it already sells profitable iPhones.
So if WhatsApp attempts to directly profit from messaging users, it risks losing share to a formidable free rival. With Android steadily conceding ground to iOS, WhatsApp can scarcely afford attrition to iMessage.
Forced to Sacrifice Revenue to Maintain Share
WhatsApp is stuck playing a delicate game – unable to directly monetize messaging without risking user losses to iMessage. The scale they sacrificed profits for over the past decade now has to be protected.
Rather than trying to extract revenue from chat users, Meta is forced to monetize WhatsApp’s enterprise solutions instead. That may ultimately be no bad thing though.
Unlike Facebook, WhatsApp has always run a tight ship, technologically speaking. This leanness and discipline could make WhatsApp Business a sustainable long-term revenue source.
Maybe WhatsApp doesn’t need to make billions from its users. Continuing as a smaller but viable arm of Meta may prove the wisest course over the long run.
Silo – A Modern Platform for Investing in Bonds
With interest rates rising, Facebook can earn attractive yields on cash reserves by investing in bonds and treasury bills. But most brokerages still offer clunky, outdated investing experiences.
That’s why Silo aims to make bond investing straightforward for those looking to capitalize on higher yields. By prioritizing an intuitive user interface alongside security, we help you easily invest with issuers you recognize and trust.
Every Silo account also includes $500,000 of SIPC coverage plus $2.5 million in FDIC insurance. So you can feel fully protected while conveniently locking in higher interest rates.
